A recent opinion piece in
Thailand’s The Nation newspaper entitled “Eat Dogs, Reduce Disease” defended
the practice of eating dogs in that part of the world with the point that “the cultural taboo against
eating dogs is largely of European origin”.
I have a lot of sympathy with this view as there are clear
differences in cultural attitudes towards dogs, and the western view is very
often expressed too forcefully and too arrogantly. For many people like me the
issue is not so much the actual eating but the extremely cruel treatment that
usual goes with the practice.
However, the author, having
derided this imposition of western attitude, then falls into his own trap with the statement, “In
Thailand there are millions of feral dogs that are not fed, vaccinated or cared
for”. These “feral” dogs fall into two categories: abandoned pets that need our
help and village dogs that have been living the unowned, free-ranging lifestyle
with a close relationship to the human residents since long before westerners imposed
pets dogs as the ideal. Neither of these groups are feral in that they typically
do get deliberate support from the human population and they do not avoid human
contact. In the case of the latter group they are also already receiving all
the care they require.
Apparently, if the author had his way then the indigenous cultural
tradition of Thailand’s village dogs would disappear.
I totally agree with his penultimate sentence:“One must
ask whether Westerners should be imposing their cultural idiosyncrasies on
Southeast Asians.” I just wish he would follow his own advice.
|
Learn more about the lives and issue of unowned dogs in my e-book ”A Stray View” available from Bangkok Books (readable as .pdf on any computer) |
Thursday, October 18, 2012
Falling into the Cultural Attitude Trap
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment