Citizen Matters website based in Bangalore has posted a heart-felt plea to leave “independent dogs” in India
alone following a court judgement that allows for the extermination of dogs
deemed a “menace” or “nuisance” without defining quite what these terms mean.
This judgement effectively allows the authorities and complainants to make
their own definitions and thereby gives a powerful tool to those wishing to see
dog-free streets. This problem was flagged by analysis of the court judgement
by the Voice of Stray Dogs voluntary organisation (see detail here).
The article makes many good
points about the situation and history of free-roaming dogs in India, for
example, about the unsolved garbage situation being such a large part of the
problem and the fact that we only ever hear one side of the story when a dog
bites but in many cases it may well have been a defensive reaction following
provocation.
In discussing the role of these dogs as
communal security alerts, which is usually taken to mean helping to protect
property from human intruders, they add a new slant with the question, “At a
time when attacks [by men] on the elderly and single women are increasing,
should the city authorities be going after independent dogs?”. Too many people
are far too quick to call street dogs a menace without seeing the safety they
provide through their alertness.
This is the first time I have seen
the word “independent” used to describe dogs that most people would call
“stray”. I agree with the article’s author that it is a much better description,
as for the most part these animals are exactly where they belong and not at all
stray. My feeling is that “stray” should only be used for abandoned pets or pet
dogs on the loose, and that we should recognise independence as a perfectly
legitimate lifestyle for dogs in many countries. I also like another relatively
new term, “community dogs”, as a way of describing the relationship between
many free-ranging dogs and people but this perhaps puts a slightly different
emphasis on their role by implying (communal) ownership. I hope the tag of
independent dogs spreads as it is not only a good description but also hints at
respect and acceptance.
As this article about Bangalore
says, independent dogs are part of the city’s soul.
|
Learn more about the lives and issue of unowned dogs in my e-book ”A Stray View” available from Bangkok Books (readable as .pdf on any computer) |
Thursday, December 27, 2012
Let India’s Independent Dogs Live
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
An update:
ReplyDeleteSupreme Court stays Karnataka High Court order directing the BBMP to cull strays that are a ‘menace’ or ‘cause nuisance’
http://www.strays.in/index.php/2013/02/supreme-court-stays-karnataka-high-court-order-directing-the-bbmp-to-cull-strays-that-are-a-menace-or-cause-nuisance/
Thanks for the update
Delete