This article in American Scientist presents an interesting theory that working with wolves/early dogs
gave modern humans the edge over Neandertals during the 10,000 year overlap of the
two living together in Europe and the middle east. Using modern-day evidence to
show that hunting efficiency improves with the aid of dogs plus evidence that
early dogs were associated with modern human campsites but not Neandertal
campsites, the author surmises that it was these canines that meant the human
population “grew so rapidly that it overwhelmed Neandertals with its sheer
numbers”.
But why did the wolves/early
dogs work with modern man rather than Neandertals? The author’s theory is that
it might have been due to the whites of our eyes (the sclerae) which are
uniquely ubiquitous amongst people and make it much easier to follow
eachother’s gaze. This could have given modern humans an advantage in silent
communication whilst hunting and this could have included early dogs as well given
that dogs have been shown to have a particular talent for reading our gaze
direction. However, this theory depends on the lack of white sclerae in Neandertals for which there is no evidence one way or the other at present.
No comments:
Post a Comment