A story from Chile (here)
highlights the fact that not everybody hates having stray or street dogs
around. Many people actually value them. The article covers the protests in
reaction to the killing of over 40 strays by poisoning. Such protests are quite
normal around the world but in this case there was the twist that the
protesters had an obvious target for their anger (even though they did not know
who did the actual poisoning), namely, a bishop who had earlier claimed that
“God allowed humans to eradicate stray dogs”. The bishop apparently made the
comments after he “was attacked by six dogs a few days earlier” and his words
are being blamed for the subsequent killings.
An interesting point to come from
this story is that not all the poisoned dogs were unowned street dogs; at least
five were pets later identified by their owners. Disappointingly, the animal
activists are still only blaming abandonment of pets for the high numbers of
dogs on the streets when the evidence in this case points in part to pets-on-the-loose.
I am convinced that these pets, which are socialised to people, are much more
aggressive to humans than dogs born on the streets. My suspicion, therefore, is
that the dogs that attacked the bishop, which led to his words condemning stray
dogs, which may have led to the poisonings, could well have actually been pet
dogs. In which case it would just be another example of street dogs getting
blamed for the deeds of pet dogs.
|
Learn more about the lives and issue of unowned dogs in my e-book ”A Stray View” available from Bangkok Books (readable as .pdf on any computer) |
Thursday, January 17, 2013
Bishop Embroiled in Stray Dog Poisonings
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment