At present, cruelty to somebody else’s pet
does actually already risk harder punishment but because the owner suffered (financial
and property loss) not because the animal suffered.
This change is most notably relevant to
stray dogs which, as elsewhere in the world, are particularly vulnerable to
cruelty and often bear the brunt of misdirected human aggression. It should
also deter some of the cruel current measures used by some municipalities to
deal with their stray dog populations through, for example, poisoning.
As I wrote in an earlier blog about Istanbul, Turkey has an interesting but chequered historical relationship with
its unowned dogs. A quote in the above article touches on this theme: “Historically,
Turkey doesn’t have a history of mistreating animals but, ironically, efforts
to modernize Turkey came hand-in-hand with the implementation of draconian
methods to attempt to control animal populations.”
No comments:
Post a Comment